Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Ruth Institute conference and other things

I really need to start writing more in this blog! Now that summer's afoot I really should start devoting more time to it. Here marks my resolution to try!  :-)

I spent the weekend moving back to my parents' house for the summer. I found someone to take over my part of the lease for my apartment for the summer--that way I can save some money and pay off my credit card before I leave for Montana. My parents moved into a smaller apartment after I moved away from home five years ago, so I'm in the spare bedroom sharing a room with my mom (because my dad snores and my mom can't sleep because of it, lol!). Quarters are slightly cramped but that's alright. Theoretically the small space of the apartment and the room could really be annoying, but most of my evenings are spent downtown with friends and doing various things anyway, so it won't be too bad. Good to save money in any case, and it will also be good to spend some more time with my parents before I leave for Montana (and wherever else after that!).

I just received word that I have been accepted to attend the "It Takes a Family to Raise a Village" conference in San Diego this August. It is hosted by the Ruth Institute, which is a project of the National Organization for Marriage. It is being hosted at The University of San Diego, which is a Catholic university. The purpose of the conference is to provide political and social reasoning for the protection of marriage. This is going to be great, because while I can theologically defend marriage between a man and a woman, it is much more difficult to defend marriage outside of Biblical principles. The website says that students can expect to be exposed to "Faculty members from across many academic disciplines, students and faculty from across the faith traditions that support natural marriage," and "like-minded students from different schools."

It seems like it's going to be a sort of conglomeration of various types of belief and thought, but all directed towards the common purpose of marriage between a man and a woman. I guess we'll see if that's truly the case when the time comes. I'm very excited for this opportunity! I never would have been able to attend if they hadn't accepted my application for a travel voucher, either. I don't usually apply for things like this because I'm always so doubtful that my requests for monetary support will be granted. That's actually why I never applied for scholarships in school--because I thought it would just be a huge waste of time since there's no way they would even consider my requests. I'm starting to realize that it's not actually a waste of time at all--people do grant requests. It's funny how we humans think, sometimes.

This actually can be compared to my relationship with Jesus in a huge way. Because I never believe that I can accept anything from Him, and usually never believe He's offering me anything, either. The concept of grace and salvation is sometimes just too much for me, I halfway don't believe it sometimes. A lot of times. It's difficult to even let people pray for me on an individual basis because of this. If we're in a huge group accepting prayer requests from everyone then I feel fine, but if someone just wants to pray for me and only me, then I feel weird and uncomfortable about it. I feel weird asking God for things for myself. I'm not sure if that's because I just feel totally undeserving and like I should be punished for sin, or because I just don't truly believe that God loves me, or what.

Wow, I intended this post to be informative and ended up on a tangent filled with angst and self-analysis. Sorry about that!

Anywayz--for more information about the conference, visit the website. There's already conflict over the conference, which is to be expected I guess. On a blog I found recently, the author condemns it, saying that the conference "invites students to discover the fun in denying and eliminating the fundamental rights of their fellow citizens who happen to be gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender." He goes on to say, "It would be fabulous if San Diego’s gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender student activist community signed up and showed up. Best of all, it’s absolutely free." He then directs visitors to the online application.

I find this sort of thing to be both sad and irritating. I understand that supporters of same-sex marriage consider it a personal affront to their liberty that there are people who want to deny them this "right." However, I would never ask my fellow anti-homosexual-marriage friends to sign up for a conference for gay marriage just so that we can "infiltrate" and attack proponents of gay marriage from "within." It's so ridiculous to me that the argument has gotten so hostile. Why can't people just communicate with civility?

It also irks me that proponents of same-sex marriage say that people like me are intolerant for only wanting heterosexual marriage to be lawful. This whole idea of "tolerance" is completely erroneous and illogical. After all, if I, as an opponent of same-sex marriage, want to join the administrative board for an LGBT group--or even to volunteer for such a group--I would be denied because of my beliefs, right? LGBT groups promote tolerance for all people, but the nature of their group is such that inherent within it is an intolerance for any other kind of belief system that opposes same-sex marriage or LGBT lifestyles. There really is no such thing as "tolerance," because the very nature of belief systems will not allow for all-inclusiveness.

Phew. Now that I've gotten all that off my chest, I'll wrap up by saying that I'm going to start a website soon, which is intended to keep track of the happenings in Montana. If I get it going soon enough, though, I'll probably be adding a link to the Ruth Institute conference, as well. I'm so excited that I got accepted to this conference, with the travel voucher and all! I really need to start believing that I'll get accepted to things I apply for. Especially now that I'm starting to apply for grad schools and such. Self-confidence undoubtedly shines through in personal essays, but self-doubt is probably even more obvious.

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Long time No write!

Wow, it's been a very, VERY long while.

Two words:  Thesis. Finished.

w00t!

And, more exciting news: I've now officially graduated and hold a Bachelor of Arts in English. Finally. I thought this day would never arrive.

Okay, now that that's out of the way.  :-D

I leave for Montana Wilderness School of the Bible on August 20th, and I plan to spend the summer READING READING READING everything I can get my hands on, because FINALLY I don't have to worry about school. For three months, anyway.  :-)   My other summer adventure is going to be applying to graduate schools in New York for social work.

My other summer project is going to be trying to learn as much as I can about apologetics. I keep being bombarded with questions from non-believers that I can't answer, and I keep coming back to 1 Peter 3:15, which says "Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have." Mostly I think that the answers we can give people about our faith do not necessarily have to be grounded in solid evidence, because faith, after all, is an expression of fealty when solid evidence does not always exist--faith doesn't exist when everything is proven beyond a doubt, yeah? But as Christians we should be able to intelligently defend our faith to the best of our ability, and learn as much as we can about the history of Christianity and the philosophy behind the faith so that we have something to say besides "well, Jesus says it's wrong" or "the Bible says so" when we're faced with our peers' arguments.

More and more I've been faced with this sort of skepticism. It's interesting because when I tell people I'm going to school for Biblical studies next year, they always ask why, and I'll say something like "I want to learn as much as I can about theology and Christianity." At first they don't say anything, but as the discussion gets deeper and they realize that I actually claim the faith as my own rather than just wanting to learn about it, they start turning questions on me that I can't answer right away, questions about the reasons for events in the Bible, and prophecies, and philosophies, and everything else that I can't adequately answer at the moment. Usually I'll say something to the effect of "this is why I'm going to school, so I can learn about those things and be able to respond to those kinds of questions." Because I don't think there's anything wrong with saying that you honestly don't know the answers, especially if you're actively trying to find out the answers yourself. But it gets frustrating to have to say over and over again, "I don't know, I don't know." I'm practically starving for Bible school right now.

I've been thinking more about what I want to do after Montana, hence my applying to schools for social work in New York. I've always wanted to live in New York--the Manhattan or Brooklyn area--and I'd love to practice some sort of social work there. But if God is calling me for some other kind of missions work there, that'd be amazing too. I want to do something good there, and I know that social work can open up tons of doors for me. That's the plan for the moment--unless God decides to dramatically turn my world upside down, which I'm no stranger to--hehe. Either way, the next couple of years are bound to be pretty interesting.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Prayers for my cousins

Hi blogger friends!

I would like to request prayer from my readers this week -- I am visiting my cousins Jake, Joe, Leah, and Rachael until this Wednesday. They were raised Catholic, but I am not sure if they still believe in God, or if they do I think they have turned away from Him.

I try to visit my cousins about once every two or three months -- I have no brothers and sisters, and I almost feel like my cousins are the siblings I never had. We are very close, and I would hate to lose the closeness that I have with them.

I rededicated my life to Christ only this past summer, and it's since been difficult to be around my cousins, because they quite regularly mock tenets of Christianity that I hold dear to my heart, things like abstinence, the need for Christ, and setting your life apart from the world.

It's difficult when I'm around them, I never know what I should or shouldn't say. I'm praying that God will give me guidance and provide opportunities to tell my family what I believe without them feeling like I'm intrusive -- the last thing I want them to be is standoffish when I'm trying to show them the love of Jesus through my actions and words.

Please pray for me, that God will bless me and my cousins, Jake, Joe, Leah, and Rachael, and show me the ways in which I can witness to them. Pray that God will open their hearts to His message.

Also, keep in prayer my cousin Jake, who is in remission from cancer, but is suffering from depression. Pray that God will reveal Himself to Jake in a HUGE way so that he knows he's not alone. I have requested prayers for Jake before, please read this post to reread and make prayers more specific. Thank you SO MUCH.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

That Age Old Question

Alright blogger friends -- I'm in need of your opinions and advice!

One of my friends posted the following in a note on facebook about homosexual relationships. I have many friends who are gay, so this is particularly difficult to face because if I am too adamant about the fact that I don't believe homosexual relationships are okay, it closes the doors to those friendships and potential witnessing opportunities. When confronted with this kind of post, I never know how to respond or even if I should. I do not know enough about the history of the Bible and the original Hebrew and the culture and whatnot to be able to give any sort of legitimate response. When faced with these issues, most of the time I say nothing for fear that my response will be detrimental rather than helpful. If you know of any books on the subject that would be awesome. College kids especially face this issue all the time. With the recent political developments and controversies, protests are common occurrences on campus. What sorts of responses do you give when faced with these arguments? And man, I wonder how fired up and boiling over you all are going to be after reading these!

A lesson about the book of Leviticus

Homophobic fundamentalists often quote two particular verses that seem to be against gay people. These two verses, both of which appear in the book of Leviticus, are . . .

"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination." (Leviticus 18:22)

and . . .

"If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them." (Leviticus 20:13)

Below, we'll take a look at other scripture verses that are in the exact same book (Leviticus) as the above verse. This exercise proves that those preachers who are so enthusiastic about quoting the book of Leviticus to affirm their personal prejudice against people who are gay or lesbian become awfully quiet when it comes to other verses that appear in the very same book.

Remember, this isn't about faith whatsoever. It's about people who have pre-existing anti-gay prejudice in their hearts. They choose the Christian Bible as the tool with which they attempt to affirm and legitimize that pre-existing prejudice.

Sadly, the truth is that they just don't like gay people.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"For everyone who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death. He has cursed his father or his mother. His blood shall be upon him." (Leviticus 20:9)

Imagine what would happen today if we killed every child who was disrespectful to his parents. Fundamentalists explain this verse away, saying that it is part of the Old Levitical Holiness Code and is not meant to be taken literally.

But the above verse is just a mere 3 verses before Leviticus 20:13, one of their favorite anti-gay scriptures which, of course, they do choose to apply literally.

It's just incredible, isn't it?

Fundamentalists change their entire methodology of scriptural interpretation when it suits their purpose, even when dealing with verses that are a just couple of sentences away from each other!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"If a man lies with a woman during her sickness and uncovers her nakedness, he has discovered her flow, and she has uncovered the flow of her blood. Both of them shall be cut off from her people." (Leviticus 20:18)

Imagine what would happen today if we deported every man and woman who had ever had sex together while the woman was having her period. Fundamentalists decline the opportunity to take this verse literally, which is merely 5 verses after Leviticus 20:13.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property." (Leviticus 25:44-45)

Did you ever wonder where racist, uneducated people in the 19th century got the idea that slaves were just property and not people? Directly from the above verse, which fundamentalists do not, of course, take literally.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard." (Leviticus 19:27)

"Bible-believing" fundamentalists never preach against the evils of shaving, as they do not take this verse literally for our day. Of course, they most certainly would do so if they had a personal bias against shaving, but apparently, they do not.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"...and the swine, though it divides the hoof, having cloven hooves, yet does not chew the cud, is unclean to you." (Leviticus 11:7)

As you can see, the book of Leviticus also prohibits the eating of pork (a swine is a pig). Of course, fundamentalists do not choose to use this verse to preach against eating pork. Sadly, however, they have no problem abusing the Bible to condemn gay and lesbian people. Remember, it's about their personal prejudice against gay people, not about a true desire to understand what the Bible actually says.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"...do not plant your field with two kinds of seed. Do not wear material woven of two kinds of material." (Leviticus 19:19)

Farmers in this country almost always grow more than one kind of crop in their fields. In fact, they often must do so for ecological reasons. Fundamentalists do not apply this verse literally. If they were to preach against farmers, there would be an uproar, and rightfully so.

Fundamentalists also ignore the Biblical command to not wear clothes that have two different kinds of material. The shirts that many fundamentalists are often seen wearing must be a cotton/polyester blend, the most common in the United States of America. They may be "Bible believing" Christians, but this is yet another verse that they don't believe should be applied to today.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

An "abomination?"

Fundamentalists also like to use Leviticus 18:22 to justify their anti-gay prejudice. That verse says, "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination." Perhaps you have heard some people refer to gay people as an "abomination." They get the idea directly from Leviticus 18:22. But did you know...

* The Bible says that eating shrimp and lobster is an abomination:

"But all in the seas or in the rivers that do not have fins and scales, all that move in the water or any living thing which is in the water, they are an abomination to you." (Leviticus 11:10)

"They (shellfish) shall be an abomination to you; you shall not eat their flesh, but you shall regard their carcasses as an abomination." (Leviticus 11:11)

"Whatever in the water does not have fins or scales; that shall be an abomination to you." (Leviticus 11:12)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In conclusion . . .

The above exercise proves that anti-gay fundamentalists selectively quote the Bible. They enthusiastically and openly embrace those parts of the Bible which affirm and justify their own personal, pre-existing prejudice against gay people, while declining to become as enthusiastic about verses like the ones listed above.

After all, how many times have you heard a fundamentalist say that eating shellfish was an abomination? But they sure don't hesitate to say it about gay people, do they? What does that tell you?

***********

And then someone responded to my friend's post with this:

Another important thing to look at is the translation. Most of the current bibles are misquoted because they are watered down from the original text. If you were to take the original hebrew texts and translate them directly, first of all some of the words wouldn't be able to translate into english, but the actual closest translation of that leviticus verse is: "Man shall not lay with another man in a womans bed, it is ritually unclean." or something like that, but the basic meaning is the same, it isn't prohibiting two men from having a physical contact relationship, it's just prohibiting the relationship from being performed in a space where the same relationship has been performed with a woman, if that makes sense. It's saying that a woman's bed is only ritually clean for an act of heterosexual sex. Ritually meaning in that time sex was something that was only deemed appropriate under the eyes of god to procreate. And that homosexual sex must be done elsewhere. The original texts only condemn homosexual sex when it is in the form of rape, sex slavery, adultery, or ritual sex held in pagan temples under a pagan god. But nowhere in a properly translated bible does it ever condemn two men from loving each other and commiting themselves to each other eternally.

Please voice your opinions, and give advice as you feel called to! I just am at such a loss.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Starting with Genesis!

It's been awhile since I've updated! Christmas was absolutely wonderful, except for the part where I got the stomach flu! Well, I didn't get it until a couple days after Christmas so THANK GOD for that, because I would have been devastated if I missed out on all of the festivities! I spent Christmas in Missouri with my family, but two out of the five days we were there I was stuck in bed. Oh well! I was well enough the day before we had to leave to hang out with the family, which was nice -- but then the day after my parents and I got back from Missouri, my mom and I came down with this awful cold that we've had ever since! And wow, it's an awful cold! I basically haven't been doing anything but lounging around and watching television -- I haven't even been reading too much because my eyes can't stay focused long enough to comprehend anything, I just start to fall asleep!

Today, I'm better though. After five days of doing absolutely nothing but lying on my parents' couch watching tv, I feel like maybe tomorrow I'll be back in the swing of things, ready to head back to work, and maybe even back to my apartment! Haha....

On to other matters -- I've decided to read through the Bible using the Book-at-a-Time Bible Reading Plan. I found a whole bunch of plans for reading the Bible in a year at Justin Taylor's blog Between Two Worlds -- check them out here. He includes detailed descriptions of the plans, as well as links to print-outs that you can just keep stored in your Bible for the whole year, with checkmark boxes to keep track of where you are, just in case you accidentally skip a day (which I tend to do sometimes).

Because I've been sick, I have to catch up on four days of reading today -- probably not the best way to start the whole read-the-Bible-in-a-year thing, but hey, what can you do if you've been sick, right?? Right?  :-D

This morning, I read Genesis 1-11, and here were some of the interesting links I discovered when I was doing my side-research/cross-referencing:

GIANTS:

NOAH'S ARK:

THE CURSING OF HAM'S SON:

CREATION OF LANGUAGES (TOWER OF BABEL):

Do any of you have any thoughts regarding these subjects? Not to go and make you read all of these links, of course, but do any comments come to the top of your head as you look at the topics?

Have any of you decided to follow a plan to read the Bible in a year?

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Those snowy pictures

Here are some of those snowy pictures that I promised. Yay Christmas!!!! More will probably follow soon enough.

The snow plow clearing the road in my parents' apartment complex.

I love the gazebo.

My dad had to shovel before the family dog, Vivian, could use the puppy facilities.

Vivian could barely see over the snow. Poor puppy!

My mom and I decided to bake cookies -- this is me mixing the dry stuff.

My mom holding up the finished product.

My dad and Vivian.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

purity

This may sound like a weird question -- but does anyone personally know any young adults who believe that God commands us to wait to have sexual relations until we are married? I know very few people that believe this to be true -- and this is speaking of my Christian friends. The argument is that there is not any verse in the Bible that says "thou shalt not have sex before marriage." Have any of you been questioned about this by either non-Christians or your fellow Christian friends? Do they think you're crazy for believing that God intended sex for marriage and marriage only?

On to more positive things -- I'm so excited for Christmas! I love the snow and the decorations and getting together with family and baking cookies and the midnight candlelight Christmas Eve service! I may post some holiday pictures soon. :-D  What is everyone doing for Christmas?